Early last week, for no particular reason, I felt drawn to re-read the Gospel According to Luke. A few days into that endeavor, the passage (10:18b) in which Jesus says, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven,” jumped out at me.
I’d been having a dialogue with an almost-but-not-quite believing friend and he seemed stuck on Jesus’ divinity. In response, I had asserted that it was impossible to evade his divinity if you take the Bible seriously, however at the time, I had remembered only some of the more well known passages to that effect. The Luke/lightning passage was one I’d forgotten. How else could Jesus witness such an event if he were not, in some way, timeless and all-seeing — i.e., God?
Around the same time, listening to a podcast sermon recorded last year by the pastor who has become my hands-down favorite (after listening to hundreds of sermons from at least twenty other pastors) — Francis Chan of Cornerstone Church in Simi Valley, California — he ‘camped’ on the very same verse. “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.” Just think about that, he remarked. How cool is that? Pretty cool, I thought, and also pretty coincidental that that one same small verse had been thrust into the foreground of my awareness twice in one week.
Then, just last night, I received a comment (#14) from one ‘El Gallo’ on my 12th Mahdi post from last Wednesday, featuring (you guessed it), the Luke 10:18b ‘lightning’ passage. Since I hadn’t mentioned either of the two things above to anyone, the string of three ‘hits’ on it made me sit up and take notice.
I’ve cribbed, paraphrased, excerpted and added to the gist of his reasoning below (some of which he excerpted from others) and, to be honest, I’ve lost the train of what’s what, mixing in some other things I’ve discovered along the way. As such, his comment is worth reading in full, (though, for the record, I still have a ‘thing’ against citing tracts that attempt to convince with lots of capital letters and exclamation points — one of the Achilles heels for the credibility of much of the prophecy community, I’m afraid). As with any of this, CAPS!!! or no caps, you should check it all out for yourself. Because some is wrong or breathless does not mean that it all is that way.
Let’s begin…
Why did Obama pick the story of the Isra (from the Koran) in his speech in Cairo when he said, “All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when… Jerusalem is a… place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed (peace be upon them) joined in prayer”?
The point is to put Jesus on the same footing as Mohammed (if not a bit below him). The rest the story of the Isra and Mi’raj or “Night Journey”, 12 years after Muhammad became a prophet in the 7th century, involves a miraculous, winged, lightning steed named Al-Burāq (in Arabic, البُراق, or al-Burāq = “lightning”). Mohammed rides Buraq from Mecca to Jerusalem and back. Interestingly, the word for lightning is virtually the same in Hebrew (ברק, pronounced bä·räk’, Strongs H1300).
For a Rabbi (like Jesus) to say “I saw Satan fall like lightning”, he would have to say, “I saw Satan fall like Barak” with the emphasis on the second syllable.
Now, you may be thinking, that’s all very well, but I’ve seen The Passion of the Christ and James Caviziel, in his hyper-realistic portrayal of our Lord doesn’t speak Hebrew but Aramaic. Nice catch. The two are related, but only like Latin to French. There are some strong similarities, but many differences. Throwing more cold water on the theory, the Aramaic word for ‘lightning’ is ’0qrb’ (yes, that’s a zero at the front; don’t ask me what it means). All I know is that (quite curiously) that combination of symbols is pronounced B’aRQoA, which looks pretty similar. What language was Jesus using when he said the words quoted in Luke 10:18b? We can’t know, but it’s close either way.
The “Greek” verse of Luke 10:18 does not contain an actual Greek word for “fall”. Instead, the Greek word translated as “fall” appears to be a rare form of a Hebrew word for “transgressions”. So, the words of Jesus in this verse probably refer to heavenly transgressions (i.e., rather than a physical fall).
In Isaiah, e.g., 14:14, the verses that refer directly to “Lucifer” use במה, or BAMA (Strong’s H1116) to indicate the “Heights” of Heaven! (I guess I was onto something back in February.)
In Hebrew, the letter vau is transliterated as an “O” or “U”. It is primarily used as a conjunction to join concepts together. So, to “join” in Hebrew poetry the concept of lightning (Barack) and a high place like heaven or the “Heights of Heaven”, the letter “O” or Hebrew vau would be used. Y’all with me?
Thus it would seem that Jesus said, 2000 years ago, that he saw Satan’s transgression and that it/he was (in Hebrew or Aramaic), ‘Barack Obama’. (Keep in mind that Jesus, as God, is outside of time. He sees/saw everything that was, is and that, from our perspective, is yet to come.) Is that weird, shocking and borderline unbelievable? Well, yes. But books like Daniel make clear that various aspects and meanings of scripture are ‘locked up’ for a time. I.e., they mean nothing until the context of events gives it to them. Such is the case with the Bible codes also — a phenomenon which has gained the highest scientific credibility after first being dissed.
But wait, it gets better.
In Matthew 24:27, Jesus says (ESV), “For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.” The Greek word translated as “for” in this verse in the KJV is gar (Strong’s G1063). This word can also be translated as ‘seeing’ or ‘when’, e.g., ‘seeing Barack come from the East’ or ‘when Barack comes from the east’ and shines as far as the west is timing signal that Jesus is coming back soon. From lowly roots in the Far East (Indonesia) to America (the bastion defining ‘the West)… interesting… at least. Luke 17:24 is relevant in a similar fashion. I.e., when you see this, indicates Jesus, then it won’t be long until you see me return.
Adding even more paranoid intrigue, El Gallo notes, is the name of BHO’s enforcer, Rahm Emanuel, which in Hebrew can be translated as “Thunder, God with us.” In Revelation, thunder presages ominous announcements. It also goes naturally with lightning. Now here’s where I pick up with a post I’d been meaning to finish that’s been sitting in draft for several months…
The origin of Rahm Emanuel’s first name is a bit murkier. The name Raham (with an extra ‘a’, in 1st Chronicles 2:44) means “pity, mercy, compassion” and also, according to my hard copy of Strong’s (H7357 & 7356): “womb; cherishing the fetus”. Take OUT the ‘heh’ (i.e., reverse the process that God took with Abram, when he made him ‘Abraham’, and with Sarai, his wife, when He made her ‘Sarah’) and what do you have? Rahm.
In other words, take God out of ‘cherishing the fetus’… take God out of all notions of “pity, mercy and compassion” and replace them with their twisted, earthly equivalents and you have… Rahm Emanuel, the right-hand man to the guy doing more to promote abortion and persecute Israel than anyone in a generation. Alternatively, of course, Ram implies a goat… often associated with both Islam… and Satan. I don’t have time to unpack that one!
Here’s the J-Post, admonishing the president’s Chief of Staff not to forget he’s Jewish.
National Union chairman Ya’acov “Ketzele” Katz sent a letter to White House chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel last week admonishing him not to forget his Jewish and Israeli origins.
Katz’s missive came in response to a reported verbal exchange between Emanuel and an unidentified American Jewish leader.
Katz claims that in a private meeting with the unnamed leader, Emanuel said, “In the next four years, there will be a peace agreement with the Palestinians on the basis of two states for two peoples, and it does not matter to us who is the prime minister.”
Since he said that, back in February, the administration has gotten far bolder, as have the Islamists, e.g., this letter from the Saudis that came to light just this past weekend.
“We want from you a serious participation to solve the Palestinian issue and impose the solution if necessary,” the Saudi monarch told Obama, according to the paper, which is owned by a nephew of the monarch. It did not elaborate.
Throughout it all, Rahm Emmanual begins to look like an anti-John the Baptist who mostly stays in the background but plays a critical, fore-ordained role. Or perhaps an anti-Esther the closer one looks, unlike the one who might have been, but didn’t get elected. Here’s something else from the article I did not know:
During the Clinton administration [Emanuel] directed the details of the 1993 Rose Garden signing ceremony for the Oslo Accords, down to the choreography of the handshake between prime minister Yitzhak Rabin and PLO leader Yasser Arafat.
Yeah, that Yasser Arafat. Pleased to meet you. Hope you guessed my name…
UPDATE I: In the context laid-out above, this seemed particularly intriguing in a must-read post by David P. Goldman (formerly known as, ‘Spengler) ovre at First Things (H/T: Anchoress).
He [Obama] understands the various tribes of American politics as cultures to be profiled and manipulated. He is the political equivalent of an alien species against which Americans have no natural defense.
In comments, he continues:
I would urge [Jewish organizations] to treat Obama like a new Pharaoh…
UPDATE II: Frank Gaffney, Jr. is also on point in this piece on the Cairo speech.
The man now happy to have his Islamic-rooted middle name featured prominently has engaged in the most consequential bait-and-switch since Adolf Hitler duped Neville Chamberlain over Czechoslovakia at Munich… there is mounting evidence that the president not only identifies with Muslims, but actually may still be one himself.
It’s an observation of seemingly little consequence unless one understands the specific, close and enduring ties between the Third Reich (which became defunct in Europe with the end of WWII) and many Arab governments where, in effect, it persisted.
UPDATE III: Updated video here.
Cannot say u did not do a good job with your research, howbeit I cannot say I liked what I read. One question has anyone considered going to the main stream media with this. The public have to address this issues. Our president was called out thousands of years ago. I would encourage u to publish this report with the entire meanings when translated and every instant that these words are used.
By: voter with whats right on May 14, 2012
at 10:16 pm
I about fell out of my chair reading this. I wish I could post what my father has written about the end time prophecy, but we believe the US is to play a prime role. Mr. Editor, I believe Art, I have emailed you a pdf document that may be of some importance to you.
God Bless
By: Caleb on February 21, 2012
at 11:59 pm
The Old Testament forshadowed the coming of the Messiah. The New Testament fullfiled the Old and foreshadowed the Messiah’s return. Just like the Jews failed to recognize their own, so too the Cristian church has failed to recognize his return. You will understand Jesus’ comment regarding “I saw Satan fall from heaven as lightening” when you grasp what he meant when he said “No one comes to the Father except thru me”. God bless you.
By: Alex Flores on February 14, 2012
at 3:39 pm
[...] half of it will be blanketed by Tuesday night’s eclipse (moving from west to east), while the left half of it was covered (in a sense) from east to west by a different kind of darkness over the 7700 days that ended on July [...]
By: I Can Feel It, Coming in the Air Tonight — UPDATED « New Wineskins on July 21, 2009
at 12:11 pm
[...] will also recall the significance I attached to BHO’s name as it relates to Matthew 24:27 and ‘lightning’ (’Barack’) coming from the East, signaling the coming of [...]
By: Ron Reese (17 July 2009) “Did the Revealing of the Antichrist take place in Ghana on July 11th???” « Twelve Books on July 17, 2009
at 1:45 pm
[...] Early last month, I wrote: [...]
By: Of Rahms, Goats and Other Horned Animals Gore-ing Western Civilization « New Wineskins on July 15, 2009
at 10:55 am
[...] will also recall the significance I attached to BHO’s name as it relates to Matthew 24:27 and ‘lightning’ (’Barack’) coming from the East, signaling [...]
By: It’s Him « New Wineskins on July 13, 2009
at 10:26 am
DAVID LETTERMAN’S HATE, ETC. !
David Letterman’s hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, it’s Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who’ve gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
Wrong! It’s the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that’ll outdo even Hitler’s by stating that “Judah hath dealt treacherously” and “the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this” and asks “Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?”
Haven’t evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin’s continuing “crucifixion”!
While David, Sandra, and Kathy are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
[This is one of the brilliant ironies of God's plan: In the very act(s) of opposing him, his enemies help move it along. -ed.]
(For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in “Separation of Raunch and State” and “Bible Verses Obama Avoids.”)
By: Dovid on June 20, 2009
at 10:06 pm
Very big ** PING! **
Many Rabbis are on to this too.
If the hard evidence doesn’t convince people, all they have to do is just LOOK AT his FRUITS:
Not good. Not good at all…
Pope John Paul did say, I think in 2002 or so, that the Gospel has been preached to all nations.
Looks like it’s showtime!
Awesome blog, by the way.
By: Anne on June 17, 2009
at 3:35 pm
[...] After several days of what I hope came across as a semi-coherent if often fantastical prophetic storyline and series of analyses, today’s post will be a mish-mash of stuff at multiple levels of [...]
By: Grab-Bag Wednesday « New Wineskins on June 17, 2009
at 1:45 pm
[...] That the man we subsequently elected/hired is in fact from ‘beyond the River’ (i.e., born east of the Nile) makes the prophecy fit even [...]
By: Irritating Bugs Doing the Lord’s Work, aka Fun With Maps « New Wineskins on June 15, 2009
at 8:31 am
[...] LIEUTENANT (i.e., Rahm Emanual’s relentless betrayal of Israel seals his [...]
By: ‘Sultanate Destined’ — Prophecy Hiding in Plain Sight « New Wineskins on June 14, 2009
at 1:45 pm
Correction: I loved your charitable responses to Matt P. and John.
By: Denise on June 11, 2009
at 10:04 pm
Ultraguy, I loved your charitable response to Matt P.
I don’t know whether I believe you are on the right track with the meanings of Obama’s & Emanuel’s names. It’s a fascinating theory. And I really cannot believe that it could be pure coincidence that a man named “Rahm Israel Emanuel” occupies such a powerful position, whose character desecrates his undeniably meaningful name. To Jews, Emmanuel means “God with us.” To Christians, Emmanuel is one of the names of Our Lord Jesus Christ as well. (By the way, if you are still looking for the source of the “dead! dead! dead!” story, wikipedia sources Rolling Stone.)
Along similar lines in consideration of the meaning of names, I wonder how far can we be from the end of the world when “Madonna” (the 50-year-old singer) is publicly parading her relationship with personal gigolo, 22-year-old “Jesus Luz?”
By: Denise on June 11, 2009
at 10:03 pm
Matt,
I believe it is one thing to scoff at speculative and even whimsical formulations, like the Bible Codes. What you say about fiddling around has in fact happened with those.
[Actually, after a rocky and statistically insignificant start (i.e., Michael Drosnin) they've been validated by non-believing scholars from MIT and Harvard as being far beyond chance (i.e., the number of atoms in the universe or the number of seconds from the big bag to one). But carry on...
-ed.]
But specific exposition of this type is quite Biblical. That is why we have a Strong’s Concordance; i.e, for this sort of detailed inspection. Applying Hebrew words to the Greek test is correct and defensible, as Jesus likely used both Aramaic, and Hebrew. If, speaking about eschatological matters, I assume that is when he would have been communicating his thoughts in Hebrew.
Now over 1/3 of the Bible is prophecy, so I suspect we are expected to search for greater understanding of it. In fact Jesus scolded the Jewish leaders for alleging they understood the scriptures, yet did not recognize prophecy being fulfilled in their presence. All things in balance though, and one can have such fascination with prophetic study, that real Christian witness and ministry is ignored.
John,
Are you a materialist, who thinks all discussion of the supernatural and eschatological is “crazy?” If so, are you so derisive of Evan Thomas, Chris Matthews, Oprah, and the many, um, commoners who attribute supernatural qualities to President O? Alternately, do you disapprove only of Biblical exposition of this sort? Or is it a matter of objecting to that which is contrary to your political beliefs? In the end, I believe disagreeing is fine, but ad hominem jibes are not cricket. [And, for the record, I only let them in in order to pose questions like this! -ed.]
By: El Gallo on June 10, 2009
at 12:47 am
Does the crazy just come naturally, or do you have to try hard to reach this level of insanity? Just askin…
[Calling something (or someone) 'crazy' implies a framework of assumptions for what is true (and what's not). What are yours and how have they led you to drawing the conclusions you do? -ed.]
By: John on June 9, 2009
at 3:17 pm
I have a fairly consistent reaction to things like this: it’s possibly interesting, possibly paranoid, definitely nothing to take too seriously, and ultimately really irrelevant to how one should live life day-to-day according to the gospel.
It’s not for us to know the timing of God’s plans. Perhaps some folks are making lucky guesses, but I’ll guarantee you that if you delve through enough arbitrary scripture passages in enough random languages you’ll find similar stuff about George Bush, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Martin Van Buren, or anyone else you might want to name. If this is something that makes you think about the possible imminence of the Second Coming and helps you live your life more appropriately in light of that, then anything that might spur you to live more worthily is good. If this is something that inspires you to hate and fear the President and his chief of staff, then put it out of your mind, because hate and fear are from the Enemy. Christ will triumph in the end, and we have nothing to fear from the powers and principalities except some purifying suffering along the way. Keep that in mind when you pray the final petition of the Our Father.
For many people right now, this kind of thing is probably a temptation towards hatred, so I wouldn’t suggest spreading it around too much. Find some good exhortations to love your neighbor and pray for those who persecute you, and spread those around instead.
[No contest. It's possible to take this too far. I question it often myself and urge others to take the time to do likewise. I also heartily endorse Matt's admonitions here to fix our eyes on Jesus rather than on his adversary who, in the end, will be a push-over for Him. The adversary who may seem terrifying now will look silly and pitiful in the end. As you say, it's not worth hating him or despairing over what God is allowing him to bring about, since either thing (hate or despair) will only give sin room to grow in us. This kind of thing, for example, is bound to be counter-productive.
That said... although we are told we cannot know the day or hour and thus we must keep awake because it could be today (imminence - yippee!), we are also told, over and over, two things:
1) to keep watch and to recognize the spiritual 'weather' and other signs of the times, and
2) to discern between those we should accept as full brothers, those to whom we should preach (far and wide, both in season and out of season), and those on whom we should turn our backs and from whom we should not believe a word.
Many seem to mistakenly believe that Obama is the one who should be doing the preaching. They fail to put him in the latter category (run away and cover your ears!) Thus it is worth bringing to light evidence of his possible identity in God's fore-ordained end-times narrative and alerting folks to how very late the hour is. -ed.]
By: Matt Parowski on June 9, 2009
at 9:37 am
Just like the apparent hidden message to Muslims when BHO used the story of Isra in his speech to them, so apparently he slipped a jihad verse in there too. And then, one week after our soldiers are gunned down by an Islamist in Little Rock. DHS hires a known jihadist. See any patterns emerging?
[From a post by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch]:
Obama quoted jihad verse from Qur’an
WND checks my [Spencer's] work with Islamic imams and finds out that I was right.
“Obama speech quoted jihad verse from Quran: Address to Muslims used Islamic text urging war against nonbelievers,” by Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily, June 7 (thanks to Randall):
JERUSALEM – In his major address to the Muslim world last week, President Obama quoted a verse from the Quran that is interpreted as urging Muslims to follow Muhammad in waging jihad against nonbelievers.
The context of the verse – first noticed by Robert Spencer of the Jihad Watch website – was confirmed by Quranic experts contacted by WND.
“I have pointed to this section of the Quran as showing the importance of jihad and to follow the prophet (Muhammad) in jihad even though a war may be difficult,” Abu Abaida Al-Ahmed, the imam of a central mosque in Gaza City, told WND.
Obama quoted the verse in question during a section of his speech where he was stressing a “new beginning” between the U.S. and the Muslim world, and the need for a “sustained effort to listen to each other.”
Obama continued: “As the Holy Quran tells us, ‘Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.’ That is what I will try to do – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.”
Obama was reading from chapter 9 verse 119 of the Quran, which deals with the theme of not abandoning Muhammad.
The next Quranic passage continues: “Neither the dwellers of the city, nor the Arabs around them, shall seek to stay behind the messenger of Allah (when he mobilizes for war). Nor shall they give priority to their own affairs over supporting him. This is because they do not suffer any thirst, or any effort, or hunger in the cause of Allah, or take a single step that enrages the disbelievers, or inflict any hardship upon the enemy, without having it written down for them as a credit. Allah never fails to recompense those who work righteousness.”
The two passages are part of a Quranic section scolding local Muslims in Medina for refusing to accompany Muhammad on a war expedition to Tabouk in northern Arabia, where he was seeking to fight a Byzantine garrison.
Abu Saqer, the head of Jahidiya Salifiyah, an Islamic outreach movement in Gaza, explained there are two main interpretations of the verse cited by Obama:
“First that you should follow the truth of Allah, but in specific to follow those who are in jihad with the prophet in spite of the great heat of going to war,” he said.
Al Ahmed, the Gaza imam, stated, “The verses come from the period of the Al-Tabouk war, the year when the prophet left Mecca for Madina.”
The main official Quranic exegesis, or tafsir, concerning verse 119 deals with the importance of speaking the truth. A secondary tafsir, however, uses the verse quoted by Obama to argue for jihad.
That tafsir reads: “(Be careful of your duty to Allah) obey Allah in that which he has commanded you, (and be with the Truthful) with Abu Bakr, ‘Umar and their companions when they stay behind and when they participate in jihad.”…
[And another from Jihad Watch, June 8th]:
Napolitano adds adviser with ties to jihad groups
Jihadists as heroes. “Napolitano adds adviser with ties to terror backers: Swears in leader of Arab group that hailed jihadists as ‘heroes,’” by Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily, June 7:
JERUSALEM – Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in to her official advisory council the head of an Arab American organization whose officials have labeled deadly anti-U.S. jihadists as “heroes” and opposed referring to Hamas as a terrorist organization.
The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, or ADC, also has close ties to anti-Israel professor Rashid Khalidi, whose association with President Obama – first exposed by WND – stirred controversy during last year’s presidential campaign.
The ADC also leads the opposition to domestic anti-terrorism measures taken after the 9-11 attacks, such as watch lists, background check delays for visas and an initiative meant to more comprehensively screen visitors from select Mideast countries or specific individuals labeled as possible national security threats.
Last week, Napolitano swore in Damascus-born Kareem Shora, the ADC’s national executive director, to a position on the Homeland Security Advisory Council, an outside-the-department group of national security experts that advises the secretary. Shora is the first Arab rights advocate on the panel.
At the ceremony in Albequrque, Shora reportedly recounted how he watched with his immigrant father Obama’s address last week to the Muslim world. Shora said his father cried when he heard Obama’s message of reconciliation.
The ADC takes an openly anti-Israel line. Its official material has accused the Jewish state of “apartheid” and “atrocities” against the Palestinians. In 2006, a local ADC group drew up a petition calling on the U.S. to stop providing Israel with weapons.
Scores of senior ADC officials have expressed positive views toward terrorist organizations.
In 1994, during one of the main peaks of Hamas suicide bombings against Israeli civilians, then-ADC President Hamzi Moghrabi said, “I will not call [Hamas] a terrorist organization. I mean, I know many people in Hamas. They are very respectable. … I don’t believe Hamas, as an organization, is a violent organization.”
Discover the Networks notes that two years later, Moghrabi’s successor, Hala Maksoud, defended the Hezbollah terrorist group.
“I find it shocking,” Maksoud said, “that [one] would include Hezbollah in … [an] inventory of Middle East ‘terrorist’ groups.”
In 2000, new ADC President Hussein Ibish characterized Hezbollah as “a disciplined and responsible liberation force.”
When Israel released Hezbollah prisoners in early 2004, Imad Hamad, ADC’s Midwest Regional Director, openly celebrated the freedom of “the heroes.”…
[Links added. -ed.]
By: El Gallo on June 9, 2009
at 12:29 am
Here is a [Rahm] Emanuel link, UG.
Cordially,
EG.
By: El Gallo on June 8, 2009
at 11:21 pm
Outstanding analysis. It has never been disallowed of us to conjecture upon His return. It is good to look at events with another eye that opens up possibilities that may happen. We cannot be so jaundiced and strict that we cannot perceive God bending events and history to His will and according to His own purpose. More, please.
By: Virginia Missouri on June 8, 2009
at 9:01 pm
There is only ONE PEACE, and that is Our Lord Jesus Christ giving us His Peace, Love, Grace, and
Joy Strength that comes from Our Heavenly Father!
Let us remember that Jesus Christ said that we can NOT come into the Presence of Our Heavenly Father but through Him, and only HIM! The Holy SPIRIT will direct and guide us to this Peace alone through Christ Jesus and that is our specialness that comes from Our Dearest Father, ABBA!
Alas, a symbol is not greater than the PERSON of Christ and He can only be found by a GRACE received through God by His Beloved SON!
Obama, can not inspire us to believe that a man of simple measure is an equal to Our Savior!
We can’t Bless and thank Jesus enough for being Obedient until His Death On the Cross for our sins and we thank God for His Gift of Love for the Lamb without Blemish the ONE WHO IS WORTHY!!!
By: Carl P. Kelly on June 8, 2009
at 6:29 pm
[...] god-sighting; this time in France. I expect we’ll see much more of this and also of this: “For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming [...]
By: The Anchoress — A First Things Blog on June 8, 2009
at 1:20 pm
To put everything in context here is the event that I think precipitated that fall. There was a day, in Heaven when God presented the First Begotten to all of the host of Heaven. Their response should have been to Worship – Satan, and by some accounts 1/3 of the Host refused.
Heb. 1:1-14
1 Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world.
3 He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,
4 having become as much superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs.
5 For to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son, today I have begotten you”? Or again, “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son”?
6 And again, when he brings the firstborn into the world, he says, “Let all God’s angels worship him.”
7 Of the angels he says, “He makes his angels winds, and his ministers a flame of fire.”
8 But of the Son he says, “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom.
9 “You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness; therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness beyond your companions.”
10 And, “You, Lord, laid the foundation of the earth in the beginning, and the heavens are the work of your hands;
11 “they will perish, but you remain; they will all wear out like a garment,
12 “like a robe you will roll them up, like a garment they will be changed. But you are the same, and your years will have no end.”
13 And to which of the angels has he ever said, “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet”?
14 Are they not all ministering spirits sent out to serve for the sake of those who are to inherit salvation?
[thanks tigger! link added. -ed.]
By: tigger23505 on June 8, 2009
at 12:01 pm
[...] New Wineskins has his own conclusions. Things do indeed seem to be arriving toward something. Some of us will be [...]
By: A World Turned Upside Down | The Return Of Scipio on June 8, 2009
at 4:56 am
Frightening analysis!
So if we are living in the end times (which I believe we are) and God has given you eyes to see, what next?
I guess the question is, how does it affect your life? I don’t have answers — I’ve been grappling with it myself and thought I would throw it out there.
[Thanks for your kind words. First off, I am not a prophet. Definitely check it out yourself. Some of what I've said here is probably wrong. It's just that I don't know which part!
It has made me bolder and more urgent (in witness), given me a stronger sense of how God really does know our hearts intimately and another framework on which to hang my belief that He really does work in history (i.e., he's not some ephemeral force 'out there'). And it has led me to pray more. Probably not nearly enough, but more.
So if this is all bunk, I suppose it's pushing me in the right direction.
Again, thanks for stopping by. -ed.]
By: annaldavis on June 7, 2009
at 11:49 pm
Tight wrap up UG. Outstanding. Rahm Emmanuel is beyond tough; he is sinister. He gets a pass from the media for stunts lesser mortals would be called on. One was his raging against those he felt failed the Clintons when they were in office. Stunned onlookers describe his plunging a knife into a table again, and again, each time naming a transgressor, and screaming “Dead!” In another incident he sent a dead fish in the mail to an opponent. If this is what we know despite the pliant media, what is unknown? [Whoa... seriously? Too crazy to be reported? Source? Link? -ed.]
Other than being ruthless, he is known for shaking the money trees (maybe that requires ruthlessness). When BHO chose Emmanuel, he knew he was getting an enforcer with no great love for Israel, and someone who was not too fastidious about how to find large amounts of money. That segues into Israel’s conundrum.
Baron Von Rothschild famously said (not exact words) “Let me control the currency, and I care not who rules.” So when Emmanuel says “In the next four years, there will be a peace agreement with the Palestinians on the basis of two states for two peoples, and it does not matter to us who is the prime minister.” He is saying precisely what Rothschild was saying. Israel depends on our foreign and military aid. The EU, Russia, and UN like to pose as players with Israel, but the U.S. is the one indispensable party. Accordingly BHO is being rather brutal in forcing Israel to do what they do not wish.
Incidentally, this is why I believe that if the Tribulation is near, the sophistry that somehow the U.S. would not be an End Times actor grows more threadbare all the time. God allowed the U.S. to become the most economically, culturally, and militarily dominant country in history. It is quite possible, if not likely, that the A.C. would have to come from the U.S., so long as you do not get wrapped up in presumptions.
[I've never gotten too hung up on the idea that he has to come from Europe. After all (and with no disrespect to those from other regions), the vast majority of the people who came to and shaped this country (especially in its early days) came from Europe, as did our (early) culture, religion, legal frameworks, etc. That's not a triumphalist or xenophobic statement of aspiration -- and anyone who takes it that way is sick -- but simply one of historical fact. In other words, yes, the AC could arise here. We are, in effect, far-Western Europe. -ed.]
By: El Gallo on June 7, 2009
at 11:24 pm