Much longer trend than the current administration; a sign of dry rot in our system:
“Prosecutors identify defendants to go after instead of finding a law that was broken and figuring out who did it.”
Apologies for cryptic blogging. I’m “slammed” with work deadlines that won’t let up much before the middle of next month. I wish it were not so. Meanwhile, I fix one eye towards heaven, wishing I had the courage to chuck it all and fix both there full time.
UPDATE: It occurred to me in the wee hours last night that this rule of men not of laws thing is all apiece with the elementary school indoctrination video (filmed last June) that probably everyone on the planet has seen by now:
How? It matters not whether the object of adulation is Gandhi, MLK Jr. or Mother Teresa. The Bible is utterly clear on this point: We are not to worship men (or women) — or even angels.
To briefly borrow a concept from Buddhism, they are merely fingers pointing at the moon. None are perfect as Christ is perfect. Not even remotely close.
We are not graded on a curve, as some would have you believe. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God and are saved by His grace and work on the cross. To worship something or someone in place of Him is to commit idolatry. That that sin comes first on His list of commandments is surely not without reason.
To take a more secular run at it, try the following mental exercise: List the nations that pop to mind (either today or back through history) that have embraced the worship of individual men while they were alive and in power. There will be gradations and judgment calls, of course, but extra points are awarded for those that indoctrinate their children into adulatory practices in an institutional (thus involuntary) setting.
Places like North Korea, East Germany, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Pol Pot’s Cambodia and Mao’s China spring immediately to mind, as do places like Castro’s Cuba, Suharto’s Indonesia, Idi Amin’s Uganda, and a passel of other third-world dictatorships.
In fact, once you get going, the list grows very quickly. One could make a strong argument also (on each side of the fence) for King Henry VIII’s England as well as the Catholic church under various Popes, but that’s as far as we’re going to go down that road this morning. (Note bene).
Then, just for kicks, try the same exercise for corporations… and religious organizations (think for example, of Jim Jones and Kool-Aide in Guyana, Sung Moon in Korea, etc.)
The point is not to add to the list or say why one is worse then the others. That’s easy. Rather, the exercise draws me to conclude that nations and organizations devoted to the fair and equitable application of laws based on enduring principles are rare indeed.
The U.S. and other Western democracies come close but fall short. Nations that firmly root their enduring principles in eternal truths are even rarer. Those that do that and also apply those truths to the principles, to the laws, and to the people are… nonexistent.
Yet they remain the ideal. There is one man worth worshiping: the Son of God, Jesus Christ. He will come back to rule and reign. He will establish his kingdom. At that time, I will dance with delight to watch elementary school kids sing songs and recite poems in praise of his unique, omnipotent and wholly righteous rule.
“How? It matters not whether the object of adulation is Gandhi, MLK Jr. or Mother Teresa. The Bible is utterly clear on this point: We are not to worship men (or women) — or even angels.”
the irony is, everywhere, men and women are worshiping man so long as there is a “garden of eden” somewhere or a platform to endorse the “anointed”. in our presence.
“To take a more secular run at it, try the following mental exercise…”
well said and that has to include [churches] operated by the likes of [some well-known names] and the eternal list goes on.
to me, you have defined the forbidden. SIN is the elevation of ONE above all others. when there is so many who “speak for God” or think they are channels of the almighty, the inevitable follows. stains of religious(directly or indirectly) wars and conflicts speckles our history books ( death was forewarned in eden when the people submit themselves to a “god”)
that said, though i agree with your observation, i have reservation with your resolution that i think will probably lead us back to the worship of man again.
By: passerby on September 30, 2009
at 9:06 pm
I think the trouble really starts when people begin to excessively lift up our public servants (politicians). ‘We have no king but Caesar’ comes to mind.
Trying to emulate someone who serves God well is one thing but actually believing that a politician (who has bad fruits to begin with) is going to create a heaven/utopia here on earth is another thing entirely…
By: Anne on September 30, 2009
at 8:30 pm
In response to your update:
Princess Diana is a very good candidate!
Kim
By: Kim on September 29, 2009
at 10:39 am
You have to watch this. It’s creepy, frighting, and if you think Obama is the AC (I don’t, by the way) it will give you a bit of a freakout moment.
As I said, I don’t think he is, but it gave me a heck of a startle.
[What a horrendous and deliberate mix of sacred and secular. If he turns out to just be the warm-up band (a kind of anti-John-the-Baptist), I won't be surprised. -ed.]
By: Uh-huh on September 29, 2009
at 10:23 am
When you compare to sacred (mantra) of the above to religion makes you wonder why the churches engage in it either. IF the churches are doing repetitive mantras those churches should be avoided!
By: Bea on September 29, 2009
at 3:02 pm
Funny how Christian prayer is not allowed in school but the above video of the children seems like prayer to me. That is disgusting to see and reminds me of the nazis. If BHO were truly a good man he would not allow that in the schools. Same goes with the private army! This is scary!
By: Bea on September 29, 2009
at 9:01 am
It really bothers me that videos like this are being made available for viewing by anyone. If we think video games and movies are bad influences on people, then what kind of influence can the real thing be? I know, Ultraguy, we all have within us the ability to be cruel, evil and murderous, but in our journey to be like Christ, I think we should shield our minds from the prince of the power of the air and those who are moving to do his will. Maybe this is naive, I don’t know, but I hate to see the spirit of evil succeeding in anything – even if it is just catching our eye.
Kim
By: Kim on September 29, 2009
at 6:57 am
Yes that is naive. It is good for children not to see these things but it was children that were involved. The boy that was killed was an honor student that was not involved in gangs. Adults need to understand that having a blind eye to events like this isn’t helpful. Having a blind eye to violence only gives the enemy more ground and license. But when it (violence) comes to your town, your school and your child then it’s different. This is only a miniscule fraction of what has been happening in Israel by the Palestinians bent on destruction so much so they teach it to their children and yet the majority of Americans and much of the world think Israeli’s should share their land with the enemy. I don’t think so. If I were Netanyahu i would expel the enemy and build walls. I wonder if God isn’t teaching us some lessons on this kind of hype (the hard way), and it isn’t going to be pleasant when it happens to our children.
[It's a very fine line between being aware of the true depravity of these things and being ensnared into either fearing them or finding a kind of suggestive, almost pornographic fascination in them. -ed.]
By: Bea on September 29, 2009
at 8:26 am
[Featured on Drudge is] raw video footage of a gang war last Thursday in the streets of Chicago , just outside a high school. No guns or knives were used. Instead, rod and fists were used to beat a 16-year-old to death.
You are forewarned: violence and mayhem
[Link removed. While on the one hand, I firmly believe that the spirit of evil can come to inhabit a place such as Chicago (through means both secular and supernatural), it's also tempting to say to ourselves, when we watch or hear of something like this (and I, for one do not plan to watch it) that it is confined to those people over there and that the same impulses do not run, just under the surface, in every single one of us. -ed.]
By: Eowyn on September 28, 2009
at 9:30 pm
I did not see it but can imagine it easy enuf after seeing for decades the carnage the Palestinians have doled out to Israelis. WHen the UN and the Pope this last May visit voiced his objection to the wall built in Jerusalem….I thought how easy that is to say when you aren’t the intended victim. Perhaps in time his and others opinion of walls might change. Kind of like fences between neighbors…fences and walls have their advantages.
By: Bea on September 29, 2009
at 7:15 am
Here is a further sign of the dry rot from Hardin, Montana: Things are moving so quickly and we are out of time! The spirit of Pharaoh has entered our land! We have found out that our little town of Hardin is the ‘test town’ for President Obama’s new law to privatize the police force of local communities. Last night, the city council voted to disband our sheriff’s department and to bring in a private security company to police the town.
This means that the local police force will be disassociated from the local population; the police officers will be mercenaries with limited local control; the force will be federalized: a federal created them; the Congress and the President control them: as an interstate commercial entity, they will be directly under federal control.
[Didn't the party now in control of this country object strongly when this was done in Iraq? -ed.]
By: njartist49 on September 28, 2009
at 5:37 pm
Thanks for the link about Hardin, MT. I have been researching it all morning… I believe this is the beginning of the “Domestic Security Force that is just as well funded and just as well trained as the US Military” that Obama said in his presidential campaign…
Truly alarming that this is not front page news anywhere that an international private mercenary force has taken over a U.S. town.
By: Clint on September 29, 2009
at 10:37 am
The problem is at least as old as Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar could change law like, changing socks. Darius, was slowed by the use of written laws which were unchangeable. Revocation took a new decree, and a record of all was left for posterity.
The idea of republics comes from the publicly accessible record of laws passed. The Latin phrase res publica which translates as the public thing, contracted over time in to the English word republic
It has been taught in the past that one of the things that made the European nations powerful was the rule of law. The particular ascendancy of the English speaking peoples may have come from the ‘common law.’ English common law goes back at least to 1215 and the Magna Carta
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/ancient_persians_laws1.php
http://dictionary.infoplease.com/law-of-the-medes-and-the-persians
Dan 6:1-28 It pleased Darius to set over the kingdom an hundred and twenty princes, which should be over the whole kingdom; (2) And over these three presidents; of whom Daniel was first: that the princes might give accounts unto them, and the king should have no damage. (3) Then this Daniel was preferred above the presidents and princes, because an excellent spirit was in him; and the king thought to set him over the whole realm. (4) Then the presidents and princes sought to find occasion against Daniel concerning the kingdom; but they could find none occasion nor fault; forasmuch as he was faithful, neither was there any error or fault found in him. (5) Then said these men, We shall not find any occasion against this Daniel, except we find it against him concerning the law of his God. (6) Then these presidents and princes assembled together to the king, and said thus unto him, King Darius, live for ever. (7) All the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the counsellors, and the captains, have consulted together to establish a royal statute, and to make a firm decree, that whosoever shall ask a petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king, he shall be cast into the den of lions. (8) Now, O king, establish the decree, and sign the writing, that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not. (9) Wherefore king Darius signed the writing and the decree. (10) Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house; and his windows being open in his chamber toward Jerusalem, he kneeled upon his knees three times a day, and prayed, and gave thanks before his God, as he did aforetime. (11) Then these men assembled, and found Daniel praying and making supplication before his God. (12) Then they came near, and spake before the king concerning the king’s decree; Hast thou not signed a decree, that every man that shall ask a petition of any God or man within thirty days, save of thee, O king, shall be cast into the den of lions? The king answered and said, The thing is true, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not. (13) Then answered they and said before the king, That Daniel, which is of the children of the captivity of Judah, regardeth not thee, O king, nor the decree that thou hast signed, but maketh his petition three times a day. (14) Then the king, when he heard these words, was sore displeased with himself, and set his heart on Daniel to deliver him: and he laboured till the going down of the sun to deliver him. (15) Then these men assembled unto the king, and said unto the king, Know, O king, that the law of the Medes and Persians is, That no decree nor statute which the king establisheth may be changed. (16) Then the king commanded, and they brought Daniel, and cast him into the den of lions. Now the king spake and said unto Daniel, Thy God whom thou servest continually, he will deliver thee. (17) And a stone was brought, and laid upon the mouth of the den; and the king sealed it with his own signet, and with the signet of his lords; that the purpose might not be changed concerning Daniel. (18) Then the king went to his palace, and passed the night fasting: neither were instruments of musick brought before him: and his sleep went from him. (19) Then the king arose very early in the morning, and went in haste unto the den of lions. (20) And when he came to the den, he cried with a lamentable voice unto Daniel: and the king spake and said to Daniel, O Daniel, servant of the living God, is thy God, whom thou servest continually, able to deliver thee from the lions? (21) Then said Daniel unto the king, O king, live for ever. (22) My God hath sent his angel, and hath shut the lions’ mouths, that they have not hurt me: forasmuch as before him innocency was found in me; and also before thee, O king, have I done no hurt. (23) Then was the king exceeding glad for him, and commanded that they should take Daniel up out of the den. So Daniel was taken up out of the den, and no manner of hurt was found upon him, because he believed in his God. (24) And the king commanded, and they brought those men which had accused Daniel, and they cast them into the den of lions, them, their children, and their wives; and the lions had the mastery of them, and brake all their bones in pieces or ever they came at the bottom of the den. (25) Then king Darius wrote unto all people, nations, and languages, that dwell in all the earth; Peace be multiplied unto you. (26) I make a decree, That in every dominion of my kingdom men tremble and fear before the God of Daniel: for he is the living God, and stedfast for ever, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed, and his dominion shall be even unto the end. (27) He delivereth and rescueth, and he worketh signs and wonders in heaven and in earth, who hath delivered Daniel from the power of the lions. (28) So this Daniel prospered in the reign of Darius, and in the reign of Cyrus the Persian.
By: tigger23505 on September 28, 2009
at 3:55 pm