Longtime readers know I was a fan of George Bush as president and anything but a fan of the current one. Let’s just get that out of the way and set it aside for a moment. This post isn’t about politics, though it has helped me continue my journey beyond politics.
I was under the impression that the U.S. is coming under judgment because (among other things, e.g., life issues) BHO’s policies represent a sharp, unprecedented break from 60+ years of American support for Israel. Jimmy Carter’s and Bill Clinton’s coddling of Israel’s enemies seem to stand as pale shadows in contrast with the deep, settling darkness BHO appears to be pursuing in that domain.
I was inclined to see BHO himself as the cause of impending judgment and/or view his election in itself as a kind judgment — the out-working of widespread apostasy and idolatry in any number of domains. Those still may be true, but in much too small a context — i.e., I was wrong to focus only on him. Hear me out.
I just discovered one of those Biblical-prophetic close-in date “things” I’ve been seeing the past year. It was so clear when I did the spreadsheet an hour ago as to make me sit up and gasp in trembling awe for what it says about God’s nature (outside of time; omnipotent; omnipresent; seen it all “already”) and what it implies about our near future.
Short take: one way or the other, there won’t be a lot more of it (our future) down here on earth!
As many of you know, I’ve written several times about how, the 1260-, 1290- and 1335-day prophetic measuring sticks laid out in Daniel and Revelation seem to demarcate not just the tribulation period, but a series of what one might describe as “time ripples” linking pairs and groups of key end-times, trib-related events.
If we think of these as akin to contractions or birth pains, we would find ample Biblical support, though I’m not wedded to that imagery in relation to this. The point is that key milestones around Israel (e.g., Netanyahu’s 2005 resignation) seem to be tightly linked according to these three Danielian date-spans to key events here in the U.S. (e.g., BHO’s inauguration) and vice versa.
Late last night, over a big bowl of vanilla ice cream over warm berries at my kitchen counter (yum!), I was startled to read, on pages 132-133 of Chuck Missler’s book “20/20 Prophecy” about the May 26, 2005 meeting between then-President Bush and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and the announcement that followed it. If memory serves, that took place around one of my brother’s several relapses with cancer. I was kinda distracted and so never read much of the commentary on it.
Here’s the Bush money quote:
Any final status agreement must be reached between the two parties, and changes to the 1949 Armistice Lines must be mutually agreed to. A viable two-state solution must ensure contiguity on the West Bank, and a state of scattered territories will not work. There must also be meaningful linkages between the West Bank and Gaza. This is the position of the United States today; it will be the position of the United States at the time of final status negotiations.
George Bush, the man whom I’d thought was a staunch defender of Israel (and who was, in many ways), had just drawn a line in the sand for them far more conciliatory to those who have sought their elimination than any U.S. president ever.
The 1949 lines represent the point in time at which Israel, in its modern incarnation, was at its weakest — just after its Arab neighbors had taken what would be their best shot at a national partial-birth abortion. (Their attempt at national infanticide, in 1967, would fail as well).
The 1949 lines did not allow Israel access to East Jerusalem or to the Temple Mount — a geographical state-of-affairs about as hard against the grain of God’s plan as its possible to get. (I didn’t know this until recently, but Jerusalem isn’t mentioned even once in the Koran. muslims only grafted it onto their narrative as a ‘holy’ site later in a move that seemed almost perfectly crafted to oppose and irritate Jews and Christians. Question: what other cities outside of their historical lands have muslims ever claimed as holy after mohammed’s death? Exactly… )
The 1949 Armistice Lines represent an undoing of every gain Israel has ever made in its efforts to establish common-sense buffers from regular attack. They represent a profoundly smaller footprint than the 1921 British Mandate for Palestine from which the entire country of Jordan was carved out specifically for the purposes of housing those who fled in advance of Arab attempts at incursion. To the degree that the media’s memories go back at all, they seldom go back to any of these key events in Israel’s struggle to exist, or their details, much less the reason Israel was established in the first place (the Holocaust).
I won’t belabor the point. Many other commentators far wiser and more studied in these things than I am have described that May 26, 2005 meeting between Bush and Abbas, and its outcome, in superlative terms. (I.e., superlatively negative for Israel). Even if you disagree with me, it cannot be argued that it was a major watershed for that country, and ours.
On the premise that, in the Hebrew (i.e., Biblical) worldview prophecy is pattern, and not just prediction (aka, “history echoes”), here’s what I discovered:
May 26, 2005 plus 1260 days takes us to November 6, 20098, the day all voting results from the fifty states in the 2008 presidential election had come in, making clear beyond a shadow of a doubt that BHO was this country’s choice.
May 26,2005 plus 1290 days takes us to December 6, 2008, the day that BHO first began to reveal the full scope of his socialist agenda (‘Public Works on a Vast Scale’, said the relatively staid and left-leaning WaPo). In a prophetic vein, it also happens to have been the 4th anniversary of the Al Q’aeda attack on the U.S. Consulate in Jedda, Saudi Arabia, the 10th anniversary of Hugo Chavez’ election, the 39th anniversary (3X13) of the murder by Hells’ Angels members at a Rolling Stones concert at the Altamont Motor Speedway.
It’s also the 125th anniversary of the Washington Monument: “On December 6, 1884, workers placed the 3,300 pound marble capstone on the Washington Monument, and topped it with a nine-inch pyramid of cast aluminum, completing construction of the 555-foot Egyptian obelisk.”
(That would translate, in prophetic terms as a kind of national-scale institutionalization of Baal worship (the obelisk), but there’s more to it than that. Interestingly, the monument’s height symbolizes grace (five) as well as grace perfected (repeated 3X). Very interesting. [UPDATE I: I just realized, during some prayer time, that the 125th anniversary, in 2008, would also be 5X5X5. Again, grace perfected. What might that mean in this context? Perhaps that America has tried God's patience to an extreme degree. Fortunately, the author of grace has plenty of it to pour out, though he will not do so forever.]
But here’s what sent cold shivers up my spine…
Wait for it…
May 26, 2005 plus 1335 days (Daniel 12:12) takes us to… January 20, 2009 — the date millions have anticipated as the dawn of a new age of ‘hope’, ‘peace’ and ‘change’… the date BHO was inaugurated U.S. President.
Something fundamentally different began on that day [UPDATE II: Daniel says, "Blessed is he who waits and arrives at the 1,335 days". I don't know if 1-20-09 was the 1,335 day mark, but it certainly seems to have been one of great significance.]
Everyone senses it.
It has been my view, for some time, that that (1-20-09) was the beginning of the tribulation — a period of accelerating descent into awfulness that has its pivot-point (middle) in the summer of 2012: beginning the day before the 236th anniversary of this country’s independence, coming to a crescendo during the London Olympics (and BHO’s 51st birthday), and concluding on Rosh Hashanah 5772 (Sept. 16, 2012). [UPDATE III: Just to be clear, that theory would put the really bad part of the trib after RH 5772, with the real end-of-world stuff in 2015. The other possibility, of course, is that 2005 marked the jumping-off-place and we're now in the nasty bit but, frankly, I just don't see it.]
Keep praying folks. We must remember that this kind of stuff sits in the context of the One who has overcome it all already — the one who resides in all believers, infinitely more powerful than the one who is in the world.
Ultraguy,
If the tribulation began on January 20, 2009, where are the two witnesses? Once the tribulation begins, the two witnesses should start their 1260 day ministry right? Also, Israel should start building their third temple in order to have the “Abomination of Desolation” at the midpoint of the tribulation. I love reading your articles, but I really believe the rapture is imminent and then the tribulation will begin.
Kevin
[You raise good, solid, Biblical points, Kevin. Short answer: I don't know.
One of the effects of these date-span 'ripples' (and it's absolutely brilliant when you think about it -- i.e., preventing us from knowing THE day and hour), is that we may not know until after-the-fact which one was THE trip-wire and which were merely preliminary birth-pain contractions that signal it is getting closer.
As with a lot of prophecy, the fulfillment isn't always the kind of stuff the world recognizes -- much less credits -- right away. (Think, for example, about the events surrounding Jesus' birth in Bethlehem. They made complete sense to many decades later, but at the time only a very small handful understood their prophetic links to Scripture and only because it had been revealed directly to them by God himself.)
Some of it, to be sure, is going to be very public (e.g., the bodies of the two witnesses lying in the streets and Jesus coming on the clouds are seen instantly across the globe) but other bits of it may be far more subtle at first. If some of these events are akin to the 1st century experience, then they will also defy some of the most orthodox expectations as to the form they will take. (E.g., what exactly is the abomination of desolation? the holy place? what is meant by temple? (there are multiple meanings even within scripture)... that sort of thing).
We should be careful about putting ourselves in the position of saying "I know with absolute certainty that this [prophetic] thing has NOT happened.” around those items that could be fulfilled without our seeing or perceiving them right away. In other words (and I’m not saying you’re doing this), we have to recognize our modern bias to not believe something until it has made the front page of the New York Times or been featured on CNN or Drudge. Looking back at the recent past (as I’ve tried to do in this post) can often be as or more revealing than looking at what’s going on right at the moment. -ed.]
By: Kevin on October 28, 2009
at 7:50 am
I’ve always thought the USA’s function in the Lord’s plan was to serve as a shield and a protection for Israel. if we do not perform our function will we not subside into obscurity?
[I'm sure he has done other things through our existence as a nation (the Lord's plans are seldom reducible to human understanding) however, in broad terms, I agree with you. That's one of the most important roles we've played. (Harry Truman was the first world leader to formally recognize the state of Israel, eleven minutes after it's inception at midnight Israel time on May 14, 1948.)
Bottom line: Genesis 12:3 still applies to the Jewish people: "I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed." -ed.]
By: Dee on October 27, 2009
at 9:06 pm
You know, Ultraguy, I don’t care what your take is on the rapture. I just enjoy looking for Him with you. I have circled the scriptures; starting out as a pre-trib rapture believer, then a mid-trib believer and then a maybe no rapture, and then a pre- and, on and on and on. It’s finally down to the fact that I know He’s on His way, and I want to be ready, watching and on my mark to go with Him when He gets here.
[Amen, amen, amen. I never figured out how many angels could dance on the head of a pin either, but I know God sends them, and that is enough!
-ed.]
I spend most of my day looking for signs of His return, and I can honestly say that I am longing to leave this earth and this body of death to live with Him the way He planned it. But I also find it quite intriguing trying to find ways that He’s talking to the world today. Please don’t dump your blog…I look forward to reading your take on things, along with reading the thoughts of many of the people who post here. By the way, I love the new songs, I just also happen to love Isaac Watts and Fannie Crosby, and wish today’s “contemporary” church would let them be heard more!
Kim
By: Kim on October 27, 2009
at 1:14 pm
Very interesting. Where do you stand on the rapture? Obviously not pre-trib! Pre-wrath, post-trib or no rapture? I think it’s important for us to understand your view of this event as to many of us, this is the pivotal event of the end times. Thanks.
[I lean on Matthew 25 (the whole thing), Luke 12:39 and 1st Thessalonians 5, among others.
Back when I did manual labor for money, there would be jobs where we would work as hard as we could until the boss said, "That's enough; quittin' time.". It might be two hours, or five, or twelve. And back when I ran competitively, there would be workouts where the coach would have us start running and we didn't know how many repeats he had up his sleeve. (The number could vary by an extremely wide margin!)
And yet, in each case, the boss or coach knew our individual abilities and could tell when we were slacking off and so we had to go hard and persevere.
The point was, HE told us when we could quit. HE said "hit the showers". And we knew that the ONE thing absolutely guaranteed to incur his wrath was to ask exactly when it would end or spend a lot of energy trying to figure out how much more work we had to do or to sand-bag it in anticipation.
I start with the premise that this is a point that absolutely positively, under no circumstances should ever divide Christians.
To answer your question more specifically though: the more seriously I take the scripture, the more it pushes me towards a pre-trib or early/mid-trib outlook. Yet I also see many ways in which those views may be qualified by Jesus' taking a very very small group or a much larger one. It ought to be extremely humbling to all of us to remember that, under the first scenario (very small group), a rapture might only make the news for a few days and then the world would go on about its business. -ed.]
By: Liz on October 27, 2009
at 8:07 am
I confess I do not have the aptitude to delve into the numbers and dates like you do, Art, but I think God has other ways of getting some of us to the same point–to be awake and to read the signs of the times.
[The world would be a truly bizarre place if we all had the same gifts! (See 1st Corinthians 12:14-27) -ed.]
Lauds this morning included this from 1 Thess. 5:4-5 — But you, brethren, are not in darkness, so that this Day should overtake you as a thief. You are all sons of light and sons of the day. We are not of the night nor of darkness.
We do not know the exact day, but because we are of the Light, we will be not be taken by surprise. Your blog and others like it are beacons of light.
[Thanks Gretchen, but only because Christ has lit me. -ed.]
Incidentally, Left Coast Conservative, my husband and a friend have recently acquired tallits (prayer shawls) and use them in morning prayers now. Powerful. I also know of another Catholic who has begun using a prayer shawl, too. Other Christians are picking up this habit, also. Coincidence? We did a lot of research on the tallit and the tzitzits and it is amazing.
By: Gretchen on October 27, 2009
at 7:19 am
I have long felt W. Bush was a Potemkin Village; a misdirection play. As time went on he tipped his hand more and more, as being part and parcel of the group behind the power. As one small example, try to discern how Hank Paulson was any less corrupt than his successor Timothy Geitner (from, and for the same people). From the set up of the Kingdom of Babylon under American control, to the set up of our economy, it is clearly just two sides of the same coin. Maybe W played the part of Ed McMahon.
By: El Gallo on October 27, 2009
at 12:11 am
It does feel like a spiritual freight train is on the way. Thanks for doing all that math!
Just an aside-It’s funny that B/O is so concerned about FOX. I was thinking of how Jesus referred to one of the troublesome leaders of His day as a ‘fox.’
[Interesting angle. I chuckled at the whole FOX thing. If there really were a vast right-wing conspiracy, of course, he would have had a lot more targets. The fact that he can single out just one undermines his point.
The passage you note is Luke 13:32 in which Jesus refers to one of the Pharisees. And, not to make too much of this (sometimes a fox is just a little red forest animal), but one of the other references comes in Judges 15:4 when Samson takes vengeance on the Philistines bringing wanton destruction by tying flaming torches to the tails of foxes and letting them loose in the grain. I suspect that image would fit the president's agenda better.
-ed.]
December 6th leaped off the page at me, Art. This December 6th, a venue in New York City will be hosting ‘The Madonna Christmas show.’ Homosexuals are going to portray the Blessed Mother in ‘drag’ singing unspeakably blasphemous and sacrilegious songs.
[Oh my... -ed.]
The next performance date will be on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, December 8th (This Catholic Feast day witnesses that the Blessed Mother was conceived without stain of original sin on her soul). **Catholically, I think our country has also been dedicated to her under that title. On this day, the ’show’ will be (in all places)-San Francisco. Saint Francis was so into purity…it’s just such a shame and such a sacrilege.
For those who think the Lord, the Father and the Holy Spirit will allow the Mother of God to be so impurely mocked while jokes are made of her Son…I think they will find out otherwise….
Pray.
By: Anne on October 26, 2009
at 10:31 pm
PS: Grace…Full of Grace.
By: Anne on October 26, 2009
at 10:32 pm
Art,
Well said and in agreement. Prophecy is, from my vantage point, a mirroring of sorts…what was will be again in some form. (What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
Ecclesiastes 1:8-10 (in Context) NIV)
Our country as an entity, not necessarily as an all encompassing group of citizenry, is now, more than ever, leaving its Christian focus quickly and en masse (apostasy as a result of deception?) and reducing if not reversing its support of Israel, and God is warning and chastising those national entities who are not supportive of Israel as a result. (“I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” Genesis 12:2-4 (in Context) NIV)
The pot may not be at a rolling boil tonight, but the little bubbles are forming and rising to the top at a faster rate every day for those of us who watch and wait. (…let the reader understand…Mark 13:14…)
My take on it? Jesus is at our door, and our time here on ‘da planet time is indeed very, very short…
Maranatha!
By: Ro on October 26, 2009
at 8:09 pm
The Numbers are indeed amazing in them selves but… Believe we are in deed in the final seven years, though not in the final 3 1/2 yet, which is when I believe the Antichrist will have full power. Then again the final seven may begin in 2012. In either case we should continue to stay in prayer, let God handle the time structure and we continue to work as never before. Do not miss out on precious time to spend with the Father; it is vital now.
I believe God will allow evil and perversity to grow a little more forming a meniscus upon it’s cup before it is dealt the final blow. However in conjunction with that the stain of sin within the church will have to be purged and this can only come with persecution. That I believe will be the real precursor to the Tribulation, America is not there just yet but is fast approaching.
[Well put. All of it. Thanks for weighing in, Gary. -ed.]
By: Gary on October 26, 2009
at 6:50 pm
Keep sounding the shofar brother.
Eze 33:2-8 KJV Son of man, speak to the children of thy people, and say unto them, When I bring the sword upon a land, if the people of the land take a man of their coasts, and set him for their watchman: (3) If when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blow the trumpet, and warn the people; (4) Then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet, and taketh not warning; if the sword come, and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head. (5) He heard the sound of the trumpet, and took not warning; his blood shall be upon him. But he that taketh warning shall deliver his soul. (6) But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand. (7) So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me. (8) When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.
1Co 14:2-9 KJV For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries. (3) But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort. (4) He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church. (5) I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying. (6) Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine? (7) And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped? (8) For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle? (9) So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? for ye shall speak into the air.
By: tigger23505 on October 26, 2009
at 3:57 pm
Always enjoy your blog – fascinating.
I’ve recently stumbled upon a book which, if you have not already read it, I’m sure you will find to be fascinating – select chapters are posted online.
http://2010rapture.org/
[Cool. Thanks, HH. I'll check it out. -ed.]
By: HH on October 26, 2009
at 3:32 pm
Ultraguy – I must admit that I cannot remember the significance of the time frames (1260, 1290 and 1335). However, going to Dan. 12:12 – that verse is clear but the preceding verse “From the time that the daily sacrifice is abolished and the horrible abomination is set up, there shall be one thousand two hundred ninety days.” is a bit of a puzzle for me as a Catholic. There is a historical precedent for the abolition of the Church by socialist governments (France, Spain, Mexico, etc.) – in my view, the daily sacrifice is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass offered every day at all hours. I am watching the deliberate effort by BHO and the liberal Democratic party to further divide the Church and marginalize the Truth. The first shot over the bow of the Church in 2009, as it directly relates to the delivery of the sacraments by the clergy, was the arrest of the peacefully protesting Catholic priest at Notre Dame.
Will the coming chastisement for the Church come quickly as in the way of the French Revolution? Will it come slowly in the way of the slow corruption of ideals and morals?
On another note – I’ve “felt” a call to prayer – in particular, to be covered in God’s word in the manner of a prayer shawl.
We don’t have that custom in the Catholic Church (although an 87 yr. old Dominican priest knew exactly what I was talking about and affirmed the efficacy of the prayer shawl). After a talk with my Jewish neighbor, I put the idea on the back burner til I had more “free” time. That time came while at a sewing class – one of the participants makes prayer shawls and is quite knowledgable in their meaning. So, I am happliy looking forward to making my Catholic prayer shawl, covered in the commandments, the psalms, the act of contrition, the creed, the litany of the saints, the rosary, the divine praises, etc. as well as traditional Jewish prayers.
[Amen, amen, amen. Reading your Bible and becoming well versed in it: vitally important!! For as you say, LCC, there may well come a day (soon) when we don't have access to our regular sources of knowledge (e.g., ordained clergy, worship, etc.). I've had Catholic friends tell me that scripture is not for individual interpretation, however with the help of the Holy Spirit, fellow believers, and the wisdom of those who've gone before us to help us out in this literate, library-rich, Internet-savvy, Amazon-at-your fingertips generation, you'd have to work really really hard to run afoul of that cautionary flag. -ed.]
By: Left Coast Conservative on October 26, 2009
at 3:19 pm
Ultraguy,
Thanks for all the time you put into this blog. I know others will echo my appreciation. This posting is amazing! May God be praised by all who read it. He has given us His Word, and it is glorifying to Him when it is opened, parsed and shared.
Kate
[Thanks, Kate. Every time I think about dumping this project (the blog), something like this comes across my desk and I can't not share it and seek others insights into it. God bless. -ed.]
By: k. on October 26, 2009
at 2:15 pm