Let me begin very simply: The degree to which the world has accepted lies in the realm of climate change is astounding, perhaps unprecedented.
If you chafe at that assertion, or any of those I will briefly lay out below, please know that they each are based on years of research. I am weary of arguing and back-linking to prove facts that are simply… true. Check them out for yourself. It will take a great deal of work. The media has done an amazing job of burying facts and the scientists at outright deleting them. (If you don’t have the time or inclination, then watch this 90-minute video which does a great job. Some key points to remember:
- The planet’s climate has changed dramatically throughout history.
- It may or may not be warming now. Probably not.
- If it is, variations in the sun’s energy are the overwhelming driver.
- Water vapor and cloud formation are significant secondary drivers.
- Clouds are poorly understood or represented in climate models.
- Carbon dioxide is a tiny factor, roughly 1/10th the impact of water.
- It has been responsibly theorized that CO2 is an effect of warming, not a cause.
- Warmer climates are congruent on both macro and micro timescales, with the thriving of humanity; colder climates with just the opposite: death.
- If CO2 were contributing to global warming, the UN’s IPCC report says that even the most massive changes right now would have little, if any effect for several decades.
- There are dozens of well-accepted, large-scale humanitarian projects and objectives with dramatically higher cost-benefit ratios than even the most optimistic global warming “solution” scenarios.
Let’s move on, shall we?
Two Nobel Peace Prize winners (2007 and 2009) met in the Oval Office on Monday, 12/7. Their presence, scheming together around the subject (climate change) most likely to lead to world government and the temporary illusion of peace and harmony before the Tribulation reminds me of Jeremiah 6:14 & 8:11:
They have healed the wound of my people lightly, saying, ‘Peace, peace,’ [2X] when there is no peace.
I don’t have the time to delve into it, but consider, for a moment, how peace and truth come together in Christ alone. Saying ‘Truth, truth’… when there is no TRUTH.
The meeting occurred on the eve of the extra-Biblical but widely observed Catholic feast of the immaculate conception (of, not by) Mary. Apparently, she is the patron saint of the United States. Take all that as you will; those are facts, not judgments.
The Gore-Obama meeting came 12 days after the eve of another holiday with mostly-forgotten, but deeply Christian roots: American Thanksgiving. On that day (Wednesday November 25th) BHO took it upon himself to announce aggressive targets for the U.S. in reducing carbon emissions.
(If that doesn’t work, he has other unilateral tactics up his sleeve, including a pending declaration by the EPA that the breath that every living creature exhales — carbon dioxide — is a “dangerous pollutant”, as the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. Hold that thought; I’ll revisit it in upcoming posts).
The timing of BHO’s unilateral executive commitment on our behalf may have been a function of the Copenhagen summit, but it also sits in the context of the “Climategate” scandal, which was reaching hurricane force by that time, despite lock-step efforts by the MSM, Google and others to quash any news of it.
The timing ensured that opponents would be unable to marshal a response, or an audience, for five full days. Nonetheless, BHO’s declaration “was met with strong support from a diverse group of leaders, including former Vice President Al Gore“ who wrote, that day, on his curiously upside-down blog:
“President Obama took an important step today with the announcement that he will attend the global warming treaty talks in Copenhagen.
This action is another example of the significant change in policy on the climate crisis….Those who feared that the United States had abdicated its global responsibility should take hope from these actions and work towards completing a strong operational agreement next month in Copenhagen and guidelines for negotiators to complete their work next year on a comprehensive treaty.
It’s hard not to hear, in Gore’s words, not only a strange kind of puppeteer confidence in his man, but also echoes of what must be a deep well of bitterness only now budding into frenzied expectations of triumph and power. He watched his rival serve out two terms in the Oval Office that he felt were stolen from him. Richard Nixon was arguably damaged goods by 1960, however it’s hard to argue that losing to JFK under similar circumstances made him a better man or a wiser leader.
Further back, I’m reminded of Adonijah who briefly usurped the throne of Israel as his father, King David, lay dying. Once David got wind of the scheme, Adonijah was deposed and Solomon, Adonijah’s younger half brother was elevated, anointed and crowned in his stead. In 1st Kings 2:15, we hear Adonijah pleading with Bathsheba (in modern parlance, his step-mom and, by then, the Queen Mother of Israel) asking her to relay his words to her biological son, King Solomon:
“You know that the kingdom was mine, and that all Israel fully expected me to reign. However, the kingdom has turned about…”
Adonijah’s chief co-conspirators were eventually executed. Gore (who this week, on his blog, blamed war not on sin but climate change) continued his November 25th post:
It is my hope that the Senate will support the President and move quickly to pass climate and energy legislation early next year in order to ensure that the world moves toward speedy solutions for the climate crisis.”
Of all the adjectives he could have used (e.g., “responsible”, “measured”, “wise”, “sane”, “scientifically grounded”, “economically rational”, etc.), “speedy” is remarkable.
What’s the rush when the UN’s own reports say that any change man could make could not possibly have any measurable effect on the climate for at least fifty years? Furthermore, how is the mirage of anthropocentric, catastrophic, man-fixable global warming a “crisis” (much less an important one) for anything other than Gore’s career and those of others who have staked their reputations on this grand lie?
Gore’s dual sense of urgency and crisis, while inexplicable in scientific terms, is at least consistent. In an interview with the Times of London last week, he remarked, arrogantly, but with a dash of irony:
“The naysayers are in a sunset phase with a spectacular climax just before they subside from view. This is a race between common sense and unreality.”
If there remains any illusion that this was a debate about scientifically verifiable truth, his vitriolic tone, including words like “naysayer” pretty much quash that idea. (The quest for truth in the investigation of the planet’s climate was already in poor health twenty years ago; now, with Climategate, its casket has been opened and it stinks.)
What I find ironic in Gore’s words is that, in one sense (like his blog, upside-down) this IS a battle between common sense and unreality.
What Gore doesn’t point out is that both the commonness and the rationality of “common sense” have shifted markedly in the last fifty-odd years, coming un-moored from larger inter-generational truth or wisdom. Individual post-modernist relativism has won the day and it’s not about to go quietly back into the modernist jar.
Once common sense became un-moored from anything fixed, it became easier and easier to put a different kind of wind (not the Holy Spirit) into its sails and manipulate what it means to the average man-on-the-street. “Common sense” now shifts easily with mass emotion, moved with the mass media on which we’re all drunk.
Back to Gore…
The best liars nearly always ladle out large dollops of truth to make their words sound plausible. Satan quotes scripture routinely. It can be difficult but often illuminating to find those truths embedded in a tangled web of perverted usage.
Understanding can come from slowing down, thinking, studying and praying — the antithesis of what Gore urges. Recognizing these truths in their vast, proper, singular and eternal truth context is the only antidote to swallowing them on satan’s twisted terms.
There is no “crisis” beyond God’s purview. “Do not fear,” He says, over and over again. This made-up hubristic crisis of man-made and fixable climate catastrophe is not of God, but of his perennial enemy, appealing to a perfect storm of fear, ego and self-righteousness. (If I just cut my carbon emissions, I’ll be a good person.)
Here’s another truth from Gore, also misused. Most are probably familiar with it by now after Drudge featured it yesterday. Al Gore, the poet, in, of all places, Vanity Fair:
One thin September soon
A floating continent disappears
In midnight sun
Vapors rise as
Fever settles on an acid sea
Snow glides from the mountain
Ice fathers floods for a season
A hard rain comes quickly
Then dirt is parched
Kindling is placed in the forest
For the lightning’s celebration
The shepherd cries
The hour of choosing has arrived
Here are your tools
Who’s the “shepherd”? We are left to guess. We know the real one — Jesus Christ — is coming, quite likely soon. He may well be crying at all that the world’s come to. (I’m sure I’m not alone at having cried, on occasion, tears of frustration and anger). I doubt that’s what Gore means by the shepherd though.
If Gore sees himself in that role — a man of superior intelligence, marshaling a flock of meek, stupid animals (and, in the context of the poem, who else would it be?) then the theory I will expound in upcoming posts will make increasing sense.
He’s right about something else too: the hour of choosing has arrived.
Coda without comment: “Global Climate Change Conference Heats Up as Obama, Gore and the Vatican Strategize” (Their exact wording, not mine.)
Catholic clout is added to those [Gore & Obama] dramas as the Vatican delegation to the Global Climate Change Conference and a coalition of over 150 charitable agencies are poised to raise awareness, if not the roof of the Bella center where the plenary sessions of the Global Climate Change Conference are being held in Copenhagen.
Caritas International, an umbrella organization of more than 150 Catholic charities and CIDSE, a charitable agency centered in Belgium representing another 30 organizations are bringing bishops and other representatives to the conference from 25 countries. The two agencies announced their plans in a statement on the CIDSE web site.
Their representatives will be lobbying delegates to commit to the goals of the Conference…
UPDATE I: Of course it’s “in disarray”. The author of confusion is like that.
The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today [Dec. 8th] after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN’s role… The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as “the circle of commitment” – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
UPDATE II: “Was [Gore] lying or just terribly mistaken?” If you’re in the habit of self-justification and arrogance, the two don’t feel all that different.
[...] war. (I’ve dealt, in other posts with how green has also come to embody a big lie spun into the death-cult of the climate change movement. It’s worth keeping in mind, but it’s a different avenue I won’t have time to [...]
By: Tigers and Dragons, Crouching and Hiding « New Wineskins on December 15, 2009
at 10:10 am
[...] Climate change lie adopted wholesale. Yet, quite peculiarly, it is not focused on climate change per se (which would lead to equal emphasis on investigating things like solar output and on the inexorable but marvelous scientific method) but on labeling as a dangerous, destabilizing, catastrophe-producing pollutant the primary byproduct (CO2) of all animal and human metabolism: of heat, energy, movement and thought and, by extension, the economic and social activities that exist because we do. [...]
By: Sez Who? A Climatic-Prophetic-Political Key « New Wineskins on December 10, 2009
at 4:38 pm
I read the Bullinger link…
hbg (gah-vah), “high-look or proud,” Psa 101:5; Prov 16:5; Eccl 7:8; Eze 31:3
The above word is one which occurs 4 times in Scripture. There are only about 4 examples of this. I thought of BO’s chin up haughty look.
Interesting you should mention Al Gore as the possible ‘one.’ I’ll never forget the video I saw of Gore meeting with Pope John Paul II. They were both seated in chairs approximately 5 feet apart.
Neither man made any effort to speak to the other. I’ve never seen an icier diplomatic meeting.
The video practically shouted, although nothing took place.
They didn’t even make eye contact.
By: Anne on December 10, 2009
at 1:25 pm
Hmmm..deceiving powers and lies…
Romans 1:21 til the end of the chapter comes to mind.
The devil’s biggest victory has always been human sacrifice.
[Yep. All that stuff about idol worship is mostly focused on a particular kind involving child sacrifice -ed.]
Once 3D ultrasounds came along the liberal argument that an unborn baby was just a ‘blob of flesh’ was exposed as a lie. IMHO, The AntiJohnTheBaptist (Al Gore, whose name can be translated to mean ‘the slaughter) has now targeted humans as the enemy.
[I'm beginning to think BHO is the Anti-JTB and Gore the AC, but that's a much longer post and not central if we keep our eyes on Jesus. -ed.]
According to those who buy the lies; when humans exhale, we are polluting and destroying creation. No doubt the climate change movement is inspired by satan himself. God’s first command to mankind was, ‘Be fruitful and multiply.’ We are stewards of the earth not enemies of His creation. This is truly an antiGenesis movement.
[Hey! Have you been reading my *drafts* folder somehow?
-ed.]
Many voted for Obama because he was for ‘peace.’ He has just accepted the world’s ‘peace prize.’ As you said Art-’Peace, peace.’
These words, when spoken twice, bring emphasis. Like when Jesus would say, “Amen, amen, I say to you…” It is as if the point is underlined twice!
Obama is president #44. Isn’t that number supposed to signify ‘global’ things, Art?
44 or ‘Four’ – two times..
‘Global, global.’
Please comment…
Loved this post, by the way.
[Thanks, Anne. Re. the numbers, I go straight to Bullinger, who writes, in a lengthy and fascinating commentary:
"the number four always has reference to all that is created. It is emphatically the number of Creation; of man in his relation to the world as created... [re. gematria] it is most significant that we get the number four in its concentrated form in connection with, DAMASCUS, which is the oldest city in the world. The number of its name is 444.”
Here’s another, darker take that also lands on Syria and yet another unconventional take that identifies it as signifying perfect love. Hmm… I think I’ll stick with Bullinger for the time being, though since it is the number of creation, it would make complete sense that a FALLEN creation would evince both extremes (i.e., God’s love FOR the world, but not the world SYSTEM.)
Bullinger has much to say about the number forty as well — an common number in scripture.
And not to attach any more undue “woo-woo” significance to it, but I’ve commented before on how the numbers 44 and 444 have just kept “coming up” for me the past four years since my brother died in a variety of contexts, e.g. being awakened by the Spirit at 4:44AM, a license plate on a car that just kept getting in front of me on the highway, for hours, on a long drive: “444 WPP“, etc. (click on that last one, put on your prophetic hat and tell me if you don’t get a hard-to-pin-downhinky feeling).
Just this morning, I had cause to look at the fourth Gospel (John). The story of Jesus reaching out to Samaria (i.e., beyond the Jews, beyond Jerusalem, men and one-on-one directly to the woman at the well) is neatly encapsulated between verses 4 and 44 of the 4th chapter of that 4th book. Make of that what you will but I find it interesting that in the midst of that passage Jesus speaks of the fields being ready for harvest, noting in verse 37 that “One sows and another reaps.”
Here’s what I find interesting…
The next time we hear much about Samaria, is in Acts 8 where Philip is doing some heavy-duty reaping. Book-ending that section is the persecution of Saul at the beginning of Acts 8 and his conversion on the Damascus Road, and scales-falling, renaming as Paul, and immediate reaping, again, in Damascus in Acts 9. (There’s that city again!)
I’ve got a draft post I’ve been sitting on for awhile now about how Syria and its capital, Damascus may play into the whole Iran-Israel battle both in a real geopolitical, military sense but also as it relates to prophecy. I’m way over my time budget for blogging today, but maybe it’s time to dust that one off, brush it up and complete it! -ed.]
By: Anne on December 10, 2009
at 12:01 pm
Art, I had exactly the same thought. Prophets sometimes get the same thing at the same time.
[You may be an prophet, but please note, everyone: I'm certainly not one! That said, the Holy Spirit acts as a wind that blows on multiple boats (believers) in the same direction at once. -ed.]
I know the voice of TRUTH. There’s a good song about that.
I also recognize the voice of Satan, father of lies.
This whole thing is FILLED with lies.
I will like to this.
You are on the money.
By: Gene Redlin on December 10, 2009
at 10:53 am
Dec. 8 is also the day the Nelson amendment was defeated, blowing down another attempted barrier (speed bump) to the greatest massacre in the history of the world. Those (including me) who believe in the possibility of the Virgin Mary appearing in different forms to people around the world throughout history can cite a common theme: repent and pray for sinners. Such discourses as she has with the apparitionaries (almost always very simple, faithful, and childlike people) contain strong warnings that through prayer she prevents the wrathful arm of God from striking (by his love for her, not by any power of her own); that we cannot know how much the world offends God through its sins; that his anger will not much longer be restrained. If you are right about your predictions, this dating could be a warning that she no longer holds back his justice.
I know this is not a site where Catholicism is given full credit, but the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception (the title under which Mary is protectress of the U.S.) is closely linked to the doctrine of the Assumption, which Catholics believe is alluded to in Rev. 12:6, 14. This dating and the greater context of Rev. 12: 1-17 (1260 days, and all hell breaking loose, and such) is interesting in light of your patterns.
[Link added. Re. Catholicism and "full credit", thanks for sticking with me. I hope I do a reasonable job of offending everyone equally!
If you're feeling smug at not having been offended recently, just wait.
More seriously, I have learned a great deal (and hope you all have too) from what appears to be a call to straddle the fence and seek truth -- full stop. I have found committed Christians and equally committed not-to-be-Christians in every church I've been in -- casually or otherwise. -ed.]
By: N on December 10, 2009
at 9:03 am
Art, you have touched on a very important area here. Whatever the truth about the paintings/ sightings you mentioned, it has to be reconciled with what we know about Christianity and not the other way round. Jesus is above all.
There is simply too much evidence – personal experience included – to simply dismiss the whole “UFO/ alien phenomena” as fiction. What then is the truth here, because I think it is important to have an inkling before any “disclosure” is made? The Catholic Church itself has far from dismissed the notion that aliens exist and may be without original sin (link: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/14/vatican_aliens/). As a Catholic myself, I cannot ignore this, although such articles are far from dogmatic belief.
In my research so far on this question, another plausible explanation I have found is that the UFOs/ aliens are none other than the watchers/ the fallen angels. Writers like Patrick Heron and Tom Horn cover this topic as well as anyone. They quote scripture like Jude 1:6 as evidence that the abode of some demons etc is all around us:
“6And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.”
I think this is an important areas, and I would welcome your thoughts. It shouldn’t change anything at all about what we know concerning Christ’s return soon – in fact, I think it might very well be connected. We need to watch and pray.
[Good points all, Anthony. I haven't felt moved to do a whole post on this, but there are plenty of other Biblical hints (that I don't have time to look up at the moment) suggesting that, a) irredeemably evil, satan-following fallen angels mated with human women long ago and produced offspring, b) the Noahic flood and the Canaanite genocide, horrific as they are to modern sensibilities, were aimed at correcting this fatal problem, c) giant characters like Og of Bashan and Goliath of the Phillstines were remnants of it.
Since Jesus tells us that the end times will be "just like" in the days of Noah (Luke 17:26) we may cautiously infer that this problem rears its ugly head once again -- with all the tools of modernity at the disposal of these beings.
I set that all in the context you noted above: the plain things (in the faith, and in the Bible) are the main things and the main things are the plain things. These are interesting side roads but we must never mistake them for the main path that leads to the kingdom. -ed.]
By: Anthony on December 9, 2009
at 1:33 am
“For the lightning’s celebration
The shepherd cries
The hour of choosing has arrived
Here are your tools”
We have had this discussion about “lightning,”but it is worth remembering… [snip]
[Yes, good catch. You inspired this post on that subject back in June. Well worth revisiting now. -ed.]
The modern “Jewish” concept of SATAN is not like the Christian concept of SATAN! “Jews” with a traditional “Jewish” view of the Old Testament consider SATAN to be an “accuser” or an “opponent”, not a “fallen angel” out to DESTROY Mankind!
In fact, SATAN is actually two different words in Hebrew. The second SATAN means literally **** ON THE WALL! In fact, the Hebrew word SIN means the same thing **** ON THE WALL! (See Strongs Hebrew word 8366 = Satan/****/Sin).
The Satan Christians comprehend, is Strongs Hebrew words 7853 and 7854. The ADVERSARY, slanderer, opponent or accuser!
The Christian version of Satan was influenced by the Greek version of the Old Testament, created about 300 B.C., the Greek Septuaginta.
That Greek view of “Satan” probably emanated from contemporary Hebrew thought that was not part of mainstream Judaism. That view, was of the separatist Jews now known as the “Essenes”. The Essenic concept of a Great War in Heaven between the Sons of God was written about in Essenic literature that is not part of traditional Bibles now. However, their poetic prose about the “Great Battle” between the Sons of Light and the Sons of Darkness were rediscovered not long before Barack was born! That discovery was the Dead Sea Scrolls!
Most Christian Scholars now connect Jesus to the group of Essenes that wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls, primarily due to their communal concept of life, devotion to a minimalistic lifestyle almost in poverty, and of course ritual bathing or baptism. The Essenes were also acclaimed “Healers”, in the mode of the “Miracles” of the New Testament!
So, is Satan like what “Jews” are taught? An accuser? Or **** ON THE WALL? Or, is Satan really LIGHTNING/BARACK who now strolls the earth, walking to and fro, and about to take CONTROL of over 10,000 NUKES?
If SATAN is a real diabolic fallen “angel”, then the rise of Satan/Lightning/Barack is THE SIGN that the COMING of IMMANUEL is nigh…
Written on the 29th day of June 2008 C.E. by ;
The Hon. Dr. Rabbi Sollog Immanuel Adonai-Adoni
http://www.sollog.com
http://www.sollogs.com
Sollog has authored over 50 books. Most are about religion. He is the founder of Hykal ‘Hayah (Temple of ‘Hayah – THE LORD)
Most of you also know that BHO’s enforcer is Rahm Emmanuel, which in Hebrew means “Thunder, God is with us.” In Revelation the thunders are ominous announcements.
By: El Gallo on December 9, 2009
at 12:55 am
Well, I’m kind of a new revert to the catholic church, and I know protestants have a big issue with certain aspects of catholic theology, including its devotion to Mary, but I can tell you I walked into a Catholic Church today about 10 minutes early for noon mass to celebrate the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, and it was quite moving. It was packed, everyone on their knees, reciting the rosary. These were true believers. The mass itself was standing room only. I was really moved by it. There is something afoot.
[Awesome! Revival and true devotion are great things. Reading Revelation chapters 2&3 should give any follower of Christ a humbling sense -- as it did me -- that every church body has unique strengths as well as unique flaws and blind spots and that we do best when we work on our own. We will only see those elements correctly when we see them through His eyes. -ed.]
By: Patrick on December 8, 2009
at 11:57 pm
What are we watching happening? Al Gore says it is the climate skeptics who are in their “sunset” phase, but climate-gate and now the disarray caused by the so-called “Danish text” climate agreement shows it is the AGW lobby that is beginning to shatter.
A recent meeting of major financial players saw a suggestion by China to form a “basket of currencies” to replace the dollar as the world currency. This was rebuffed by the US and UK, but the crack in the global financial structure is clear. Some of the participants want out.
The most recent globalization project is nearing its end just like all others from the 3rd Reich to the Pax Romana and so on all the way back to the Tower of Babel. Out of the rubble of the failed New World Order the anti-christ will build his kingdom. It will be the last such effort.
By: CBDenver on December 8, 2009
at 11:27 pm
Wishful thinking, or willfully dismissing reality, related but not identical issues, has always been with us. But looking around at politics and science, it seems we are going through an extreme period. It is the same in other areas as well. Someone commented that both in Washington and Brussels, people are acting as if they are stoned on something. While these folks did and do love their pot, this seems to be a much deeper problem.
[The odd behavior raises the 'Pluto' question. As in: if one observes an unexpected wobble in the orbit in a known planet, say Neptune, one surmises another gravity source somewhere nearby.
In this case, by analogy, the stampede towards 'stoned' (and oddly urgent) behavior implies a dark coordinating force we can't observe directly. -ed.]
By: Tregonsee on December 8, 2009
at 4:45 pm
Good post. Just wanted to add two cents.
The first is that, in retrospect, it seems obvious why Gore didn’t fight for the presidency in 2000. He could have challenged and most likely won but let it go without a fight. Furthermore, after his Oscar winning documentary and all the praise, he could have given Obama a run for the money and been president this time, but he stayed away yet again.
Seems like he’s looking for the bigger prize, billions of dollars and a more global leadership role. In addition, giving up a presidency and shunning all that power for a decade must have involved some insider help and promises – and I’m talking about the unseen forces – not global.
Second penny. As one who has a Master’s degree in oceanography and who has done some climate studies myself – one thing that needs revisiting is the mechanism of the world.
I had evolution and the big bang theory shoved down my throat in undergrad – but it was only later that I started looking at the other side of the story. It’s funny how a vast majority of Christians believe in the billions of years old earth theory – when there is ample evidence that the earth may be much, much, younger.
Now I have not had a chance to study this in depth, but unless you start with the right conditions and hypotheses you’re not going to get anything right.
Finally (a third penny), as one creationist pointed out (that has got me to really thinking about this):
“Did death bring man into the world, or did man (Adam) bring death into the world” If death began with Adam – than the world might not be as old as most seem to think.
Thanks again for your post.
By: Alencon on December 8, 2009
at 4:45 pm
Hello, Ultraguy!
Great post. There are so many great deceptions in our society today that it’s difficult to pick which one will be the Great Deception, but in view of the way the MSM and people, in general, are ignoring Climate-gate, this one could be very well be it (as well as the alien/space/NASA deception). We are living in extremely interesting times.
Kim
[Thanks Kim. You raise an interesting question in that the climate "thing" is a positive deception (leading folks to believe in something that isn't there) whereas the other is a negative one (obfuscating and denying something that I have VERY slowly come to believe is probably true to some degree.
See also some paintings from the Middle Ages:
http://files.abovetopsecret.com/uploads/ats28207_DeGelder2.jpg
and
http://www.nasa-intelligence.com/infocus/ufosightings/madonna.jpg
-ed.]
By: Kim on December 8, 2009
at 3:03 pm