ACTS 27:41 …striking a reef where two seas met, they ran the vessel aground; and the prow stuck fast and remained immovable, but the stern began to be broken up by the force of the waves. 42 The soldiers’ plan was to kill the prisoners, so that none of them would swim away and escape; 43 but the centurion, wanting to bring Paul safely through, kept them from their intention, and commanded that those who could swim should jump overboard first and get to land, 44 and the rest should follow, some on planks, and others on various things from the ship. And so it happened that they all were brought safely to land.
In both this passage, in Acts (the entirety of which is well worth reviewing) as well as the recent wreck of the Costa Concordia of Carnival (literally ‘fleshly’) Cruise Lines, we see a powerful and direct parable for our time on this earth under the ruler of this world (e.g., “the soldiers’ plan was to kill the prisoners, so that none [could]… escape”). We also see a parable relating to who captains the ship of our life, whose orders we listen to (or don’t) and how we endeavor to get from the proverbial ship to the proverbial shore through the proverbial storm, without being dashed to pieces on the proverbial rocks.

Pictured above is cover of the inaugural (January, 1990) issue of Minerva: The International Review of Ancient Art & Archaeology (pdf), a British publication. (And no, until this afternoon, researching this post, I’d never heard of it either.)
The Corinthian helmet, dating from no later than 600BC, serves to illustrate lead article: “In Search of An Etruscan Wreck”. The caption under the picture adds, “off the island of Giglio,” the same island where the Costa Concordia wrecked ten days ago (see below). The most authoritative and comprehensive book on the subject (the multi-volume, 1983 book, ‘The Giglio Ship’, by Mensun Bounds, published shortly after the first serious recovery work on the ship was completed, more than twenty years after its discovery), is quite understandably out of stock at major booksellers, the price for used copies already bid up over $50. The detail is unnecessary for our purposes, but here’s an excerpt, as well as a snippet from the original 1983 academic article, ‘A wreck of possible Etruscan origin off Giglio Island’, published in the International Journal of Nautical Archaeology and Underwater Exploration.
Etruscan. Hold that thought. It’s important.
Note, from the map above, that the Costa Concordia’s usual route runs several miles to the east of Giglio, taking it much closer to Porto Santo Stefano, literally, in Italian, “the port of Saint Stephen”. The name Stephen means ‘crown’ and derives, not surprisingly, from the disciple, Stephen, who was said to have been “full of faith and of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 6:5) as well as, “full of grace and power… performing great wonders and signs among the people” (Acts 6:8) and who was stoned to death for boldly proclaiming the gospel, as we read in Acts 7 and briefly into Acts 8, where his burial is recorded by Luke.
The significance of the captain of the Costa Concordia (the decks of which are named after thirteen different European nations) steering well clear of Santo Stephano so as to show off in pride and eat a sumptuous meal with a woman not his wife, only to have his ship effectively ‘stoned’ from below should require no further unpacking! The world (including much of modern Europe) does not like to get near the true church, of which Stephen was the crucial first martyr (literally: ‘witness’) after Christ himself.
The Minerva article begins as follows:
“The discovery of the wreck on Giglio Island, near Elba off the west coast of Italy, goes back to a blustery day in August, 1961, when a British diving instructor, Reg Vallintine, who ran an underwater centre on the island, took his students to Campese Bay in search of shelter. There in the Bay he dropped anchor over the crest of a reef called ‘Secca I Pignocchi’, a vicious piece of granite that rises like a broken tooth to within only a few feet of the surface, ready to lacerate the hull of any unsuspecting ship that might be passing. They were almost at the maximum limit for safe diving, when Reg and two of his students happened upon the wreck.”
Campese Bay sits on the northwest side of Giglio Island (Isola del Giglio) about two miles, as the crow flies from where the Costa Concordia came to rest on the east side, just outside Giglio Porto. The Etruscan wreck is the oldest shipwreck in the world. Note that it was discovered the same month that Barack Hussein Obama was born. That may or may not be important, but in light of what I’m about to explain, it takes on extra dimensions.
In his book, ‘The Comets of God…’ (eye-opening and useful for reasons well beyond the astronomical), Dr. Jeffrey Goodman, a Messianic believer (saved in the eighties, when he was in his forties, and with whom I have spoken by phone) makes what is, to my mind, a compelling case, based on multiple lines of evidence (linguistic, archaeological, Biblical, biological, historical and others), for why Gog and Magog are not Russia.
Instead, they were a distinct people group that migrated from Asia Minor (modern Turkey, e.g., near Pergamum, “where Satan has his seat”; Revelation 2:13; home country of one of just five world leaders (Recep Tayyip Erdogan) with whom Obama says he has the closest/warmest relationship) westward to the Italian peninsula before the Romans.
Those people were more commonly known as… the Etruscans. Their descendants still reside largely on the Italian peninsula, having blended in over time.
It is supposed that, under the Etruscans, Isola del Giglio was “a military stronghold.” The ancient ship which wrecked on its rocks was carrying olives and olive oil (not uncommon, but symbolic, in scripture, of the Holy Spirit) as well “Corinthian perfumes” (again, not uncommon but, in scripture, symbolic of the prayers of the saints). And of course the helmet of Corinth, recalling the “helmet of salvation“ which Paul wrote about in Ephesians 6:17, picking up on a word from the prophet Isaiah 59:17, and echoed in his second letter to the Thessalonians 5:8). Inherent in the ancient wreck is the idea of those two worlds colliding: worldly military strength with Holy Spirit, prayer and the renewing of one’s mind through the salvation of Christ Jesus (helmet).
Writing about about the Etruscans, after several pages of calm, fact-based myth-busting in regards to Russia and the Scythians, Dr. Goodman observes (p. 342-344):
Recall that Gog is the Hebrew spelling of the name of the militant leader from western Asia Minor who was known as Gyges of Lydia to the Greeks. Migrants from Lydia called the Etruscans took control of the struggling local population of central Italy and put them on the fast track to becoming the powerful Roman Empire. The Penguin Dictionary of Archeology says “the influence of the Etruscans on Roman civilization was enormous.” Grahame Clark in World Prehistory states “Roman civilization was deeply indebted to the Etruscans.”
In the 5th century BC the famed Greek historian Herodotus, who is called the Father of History, told how the Etruscans came to Italy as a result of a migration from Lydia. Herodotus in The History (1.94) wrote that the Lydians set sail across the Mediterranean and colonized Etruria (Tuscany) because of a severe eighteen year famine in Lydia. To relieve the strain upon their food supply, half of the Lydian residents left with the King’s son, and called themselves the Etruscans after his son, Tyrrenius. Lydian oriental customs were at the heart of the Etruscan culture of Italy. According to Plutarch, Livy and Vergil, when Romulus (twin of Remus) founded Rome in 753 BC, he sent for men of Etruria (Tuscany) who directed him in all sacred ceremonies, ordinances and religious rites according to the Disciplinia Etrusca. These same ceremonial rites were used when Rome began establishing its own colonies in the fourth century BC and later.
By 600 BC the Etruscans took control of Rome and became the ruling aristocracy in a new society with an economy based on trade and commerce. The Etruscans were responsible for the urbanization of Rome, as well as it’s army and its economic advancement. They made Rome the leading state in Latium. Between 753 and 509 BC Rome was ruled by seven kings; the last three were Etruscan. Then in 509 BC the Romans revolted and overthrew the monarchy and established Rome as a Republic. The Etruscan king on the throne at this time was a tyrant called Tarquinius Superbus.
During the Etruscan rule of Rome, the king served as commander of the army, judge and priest. The Etruscans built temples, introduced the worship of the mother goddess and even began the wearing of the purple embroidered toga. The eagle or falcon was a symbol of Lydia, which the Etruscans also used, and in time the eagle headed scepter became a symbol of Rome. The symbol of Rome’s political power was the “fasces” (a tightly bound bundle of rods enclosing a double edged ax – see the 1916-1945 US Mercury dime reverse) also came from the Etruscans. Thus, both of the favored symbols of the Roman Empire, the fasces and the eagle were of Lydian origin.
From fancy pottery to oriental style burial tombs, the culture of Lydia was lifted and replanted just to the north of the city of Rome. As Gog’s descendents became the Kings of Lydia, their Etruscan cousins became the Kings of Rome (Herodotus 6:22), and they even used the word “Etruria” as a synonym for Italy. Now we can see the genius in using Gog and Magog as types of the antichrist and the final expression of the Roman Empire. Gog from Magog represents the rightful legal heir to the throne of the Roman Empire, since it was an Etruscan who last sat on the throne of Rome, and the Etruscan right to rule traces back to Lydia, whose eponym during Biblical times was Magog which means “the land of Gog.”
Brother Jeffrey goes on from there for several pages, in equally authoritative fashion, backed by sober and copious research.
The inescapable conclusion: Rome was/is Gog and its rulers: Magog.
All of which makes an article like the following more interesting in light of the Concordia parable avoiding Stephen in favor of an Etruscan military stronghold: Vatican Seeks Control Over Jerusalem Holy Sites (The Trumpet, January 19, 2012; H/T: Rob at In That Day)

Not judging, or throwing stones myself….I wonder if the “riches of this world” plays another aspect to this…
from the Associated Press:
————
By: Todd on February 3, 2012
at 1:02 pm
Hi to all,
I am an archeologist, and a Jewish- Christian, and despite what tradition and most people may say, professional archeologists know that the correct identities of all of the nations of Ezekiel 38-39 are made clear in the records of the Assyrian Royal Court and not in unverified secondary sources. The Assyrian Royal Court dealt with each of these nations directly about 100 years before Ezekiel wrote, and their records are reliable, clear and detailed. These are the same records that are referred to in Ezra 4:15 (Ezra 4:15, 19 and 5:17-6:7 tell how the Jews of the fifth century BC [538 BC–457 BC] overcame opposition by the local Persian governor to the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem by referring to these same Assyrian cuneiform court records) ; and they are the same records used to verify the historical events written about in scripture from circa 800 B.C. to 400 B.C. These records represent the primary source on this subject as opposed to secondary sources which are often not based on facts and very often the product of mischief, bias or lack of study. See free download “Russia is NOT Magog.”
Point of note: Lydia is to the north of Israel. See illustrations in free downloads.
These Assyrian records show that Magog, Meshech, Tubal, and Togarmah (Ezekiel 38:5) were the nations that stretched across ancient Asia Minor that dealt with the Assyrian court. Gomer (Ezekiel 38:5) invaded Asia Minor by coming down from an area around the northeast shore of the Black Sea, and the militant leader called Gog led a confederacy of the above nations against invading Gomer.
Bottom line Gog led a confederacy of nations and types the antichrist and the nations he leads—this seems that it will be fulfilled by the antichrist and a confederacy of European nations representing a revived Roman Empire. Ecclesiastes 1:9 and 3:15 teach that which is to be hath already been and that there is nothing new under the sun. So has such an invasion of the Holy Land and effort to kill Jews by a confederacy of European nations ever occurred before? Yes, depending on whose counting such invasions have already taken place a number of times. They are called the Crusades. Europe has invaded the Israel before and it seems that they will do so again. Check out the attitude the European Community is showing toward Israel.
By: Jeffrey Goodman on January 24, 2012
at 1:25 am
ART
I just read your blog. It was very interesting. Nice! You are certainly keeping a sharp eye on all that happens that could relate to scripture.
Thank you for mentioning my book. There are two free downloads on my website that deal with the Gog/Magog issue and one press release. (See below)
Just to make sure we are on the same page, Gog the historical man called Gyges by the Greeks was called Gugu in Akkadian, the language of the Assyrians. Magog means the land of Gog, an eponym for the country of Lydia in westernmost Asia Minor. (Just like the Assyrian eponym Mazumua for the land of the leader called Zamua) The Assyrians often referred to a new land by the name of the first leader they learned of from this land. The Assyrians dealt with Lydia or Ludu through Meshech but then Gomer took out Meshech and thus the Assyrians finally dealt with Lydia directly. In Akkadian ma or matu means land, so in Akkadian we get land of Gog by Matu-gugu or Ma- gugu which becomes our Ma-gog. Gog is a historical type of the antichrist and Magog is a historical type of the land of the antichrist. Thus the Gog of Ezekiel 38 is involved with one antichrist war and the Gog of Revelation 20 involves another war with an antichrist, led by Satan that occurs after Jesus returns and the Millennium.
As for comparing Gog and Magog of Ezekiel 38/39 to Gog and Magog of Revelation 20:7-10, it should be understood that two different wars are being referred to and that the terms Gog and Magog are not being used literally but being used as historical types. The historical Gog and the nations of Magog, Meschech, and Tubal over which Gog was a “prince” as referred to in Ezekiel 38-39 serve as “historical types” of the antichrist and the multi-national confederacy over which the antichrist is to rule during the tribulation period. The antichrist and his empire will participate in the great end times Battle of Armageddon. The Bible uses the historical King Gog as a historical type of the antichrist to come in the exact same ways the Bible uses the historical King David as a type of Jesus the Christ’s Second Coming (Ezekiel 34:23 and Ezekiel 37:22-24). Similarly, Jesus uses Elijah as a historical type in Matthew 11:14 (also see Malachi 4:5) and Matthew 17:10-13 (“if you will receive it”).
In other words, “Gog and Magog” (in Akkadian “Magog” means the land of Gog) in their most basic meaning, are taken to be types or references to any “antichrist” and “the land of this antichrist”; just as I John 2:18, 22, 4:3, and II John 7 all make it clear that “there are many antichrists.”
Please let me know if you have any questions or need to know more about this or want to talk about this. You are about to shake up a bunch of traditionalists and quick studies who have never really proved their own work on this subject. It is my privilege to help you on this subject, a subject that the church has been badly deceived about.
I love your obedience and devotion to the Lord,
Your friend,
Jeff
Website http://www.thecometsofgod.com
Appendix B Russia is NOT Magog
http://www.thecometsofgod.com/dwnlds/appndx-b.pdf
Excerpts from Chapter 9 Armageddon, Magog, and the War of Ezekiel38/39
http://www.thecometsofgod.com/dwnlds/chap9.pdf
Christian Archeologist Exonerates Russia in the End Times
http://christiannewswire.com/news/9509017871.html
By: Jeffrey Goodman on January 24, 2012
at 12:21 am
My, have you been busy. Reading about Lydia, I was reminded of Lydia who was from Thyatira a dealer in the color purple in Acts 16:13-15. The color purple and its shade variations have important significance to the occult and its variations.
See Carlos’s post: http://nabiy4america.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/the-colors-worn-and-adorned-by-the-harlot-of-revelation/
There are still a lot of shadows that make it difficult to see who the players really are. Those who found themselves in Italy as the Etruscans came from Asia Minor originally. To the north. Does this count? From an intellectual standpoint, it seemed to His own that He was not the Messiah.
By: jeff on January 23, 2012
at 7:22 pm
Interesting, but when it comes to Gog/Magog, I think that fellow has missed the forest for the trees, so to speak. He is caught up in tracing name-words and conspiracies, but he has missed the clear language of the Biblical text, which says that Gog comes from the north:
Ezekiel 38: “14 “Therefore, son of man, prophesy, and say to Gog, Thus says the Lord GOD: On that day when my people Israel are dwelling securely, will you not know it? 15 You will come from your place out of the uttermost parts of the north, you and many peoples with you, all of them riding on horses, a great host, a mighty army. “
And again in Ezekiel 39: 1“And you, son of man, prophesy against Gog and say, Thus says the Lord GOD: Behold, I am against you, O Gog, chief prince of Meshech[a] and Tubal. 2 And I will turn you about and drive you forward, and bring you up from the uttermost parts of the north, and lead you against the mountains of Israel.
This may also tie in with the descriptive language used in other eschatological passages, such as in Daniel the title “king of the north”. But regardless, Gog is clearly identified as coming from the far north of Israel from the land of Magog.
Given the Biblical compass centers on Jerusalem and Italy is west of there, not north, it is pretty clear that Gog/Magog is north of Israel, whether that makes it Turkey or a former Soviet republic, or Russia itself or some other entity.
Also, you wrote: “The inescapable conclusion: Rome was/is Gog and its rulers: Magog.”
According to Ezek 38:2-3, Magog refers to the land, Gog refers to a person. 2 “Son of man, set your face toward Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech[a] and Tubal, and prophesy against him 3 and say, Thus says the Lord GOD: Behold, I am against you, O Gog, chief prince of Meshech[b] and Tubal.
God bless.
By: Jay on January 23, 2012
at 5:01 pm